Skip to content

Obama’s Climate Change Policy Takes on Coal Plant Emissions

June 28, 2013

President Obama’s highly anticipated Climate Action Plan was released earlier this week, the centerpiece of which focuses on cutting carbon emissions from new and existing coal fired power plants. Such plants are responsible for nearly 40% of the country’s greenhouse gas emissions.

Other components of the plan focus on investing in renewable energy technologies, fortifying vulnerable communities and infrastructure against the impacts of severe weather, and leading international efforts to slow the effects of climate change.

 photo 0da0d05c-2d1c-4e5f-b929-a1d31f98ab0b_zps88f4c013.jpg

As part of those international efforts, the United States has agreed to end financial support for construction of new coal-fired power plants overseas, except for those in the “world’s poorest countries” and those that employ carbon capturing technologies.

2013 Goldman Prize recipient Kimberly Wasserman commented on the policy, “While it’s great to hear about the presidential memorandum to work on completing the carbon pollution standards for new and existing coal power plants, it sorely lacks a specific timeline for moving forward to make this plan a reality. We cannot continue to use a fossil-fuel based market mentality in solving the problem of climate change.”

Wasserman was awarded the Goldman Prize for her tireless efforts to shut down two of the nation’s oldest and dirties coal plants in Chicago, Illinois.

New York Times blogger Andrew C. Revkin echoed Wasserman’s sentiments in his recent article Obama’s Ambitious Global Warming Action Plan, “Of course this climate plan is just rhetoric until it is translated into on-the-ground actions. And the most significant steps, such as the rule-making that would cut carbon dioxide pollution from existing power plants, will take a decade or more to come to fruition.”

Still, the plan is being cautiously hailed by many in the environmental community as an important step in the right direction. Even the White House acknowledged that the plan is not a cure-all, saying, “While no single step can reverse the effect of climate change, we have a moral obligation to future generations to leave them a planet that is not polluted and damaged.”

Related Posts

A Q&A with Sarah Finch on Reshaping Climate Policy in the UK


May 19, 2026

The Goldman Environmental Prize sat down with UK climate activist Sarah Finch to discuss her motivation to take on Big Oil, and her tenacity to see a multi-year judicial battle through to the finish line.

Read more

Environmental Leadership in Tunisia: A Q&A with Semia Gharbi


June 30, 2025

2025 Goldman Prize winner Semia Gharbi digs into her work as an environmental advocate in Tunisia, starting with her Goldman Prize-winning campaign to reverse the illegal import of waste into her country.

Read more

How Grassroots Activists Are Fighting for Environmental Justice in the United States


November 11, 2024

Nalleli Cobo, Sharon Lavigne, Hilton Kelley, and Lois Gibbs are just a few grassroots leaders working to combat the effects of environmental injustice. Discover their inspiring stories of perseverance and grit.

Read more